At The Health Carey, we aim to publish health information that is accurate, current, clear, and responsibly sourced.
Despite careful research and editorial review, errors can occur. Medical guidance, scientific evidence, product information, regulations, and healthcare recommendations can also change over time.
When we identify a meaningful error or receive a credible correction request, we review the issue and update the content when appropriate.
Our Approach to Corrections
We take factual accuracy seriously, particularly when information could affect a reader’s understanding of a health condition, medication, treatment, procedure, or other healthcare-related topic.
Corrections may be made when an article contains:
-
A factual error
-
Outdated medical information
-
Incorrect statistics or numerical information
-
Misleading or unclear wording
-
An unsupported medical claim
-
Incorrect medication information
-
An inaccurate description of a treatment or procedure
-
Incorrect attribution
-
A broken or inappropriate supporting source
-
Outdated regulatory or public-health guidance
-
Incorrect product, pricing, or availability information
Minor spelling, grammar, formatting, or stylistic changes may be corrected without a formal correction notice.
How We Review Reported Errors
When a potential error is reported, our editorial team may review:
-
The original article
-
The specific statement being questioned
-
Supporting references used in the article
-
Current authoritative guidance
-
Relevant scientific or medical literature
-
Information supplied by the person reporting the issue
Where necessary, additional expert or medical review may be requested.
We aim to prioritize credible primary and authoritative sources rather than relying only on secondary summaries.
The National Institute on Aging recommends considering who created health information, who reviewed it, what evidence supports it, and when it was last updated when evaluating the reliability of health information online.
Similarly, the National Institutes of Health Office of Dietary Supplements provides guidance on evaluating the reliability, evidence, and transparency of health information found online.
Types of Changes We May Make
Depending on the nature of the issue, we may:
-
Correct an inaccurate statement
-
Rewrite misleading wording
-
Add important context
-
Update a statistic
-
Replace or add a supporting source
-
Update treatment or medication information
-
Add a safety warning
-
Remove an unsupported claim
-
Update an outdated recommendation
-
Consolidate overlapping content
-
Remove content that no longer meets our editorial standards
The action taken depends on the significance of the problem.
Minor Corrections
Minor edits may include:
-
Spelling corrections
-
Grammar improvements
-
Formatting changes
-
Fixing broken internal links
-
Correcting obvious typographical errors
These changes generally do not affect the medical meaning or conclusion of an article and may not result in a new published or updated date.
Substantive Corrections
A substantive correction affects information that could materially change a reader’s understanding of the subject.
Examples include:
-
An incorrect medication interaction
-
An inaccurate treatment claim
-
A significant statistical error
-
Incorrect information about symptoms
-
A misleading statement about disease risk
-
Incorrect emergency-care guidance
-
A claim presented as established fact when the evidence is uncertain
When such an issue is confirmed, we aim to correct it as promptly as reasonably possible.
Depending on the circumstances, we may also update the article’s Last Updated date.
Updated Dates
We do not intend to change article dates simply to make content appear newer.
A Last Updated date should generally reflect a meaningful editorial change, such as:
-
Updating important medical information
-
Adding substantial new information
-
Revising outdated recommendations
-
Rechecking sources
-
Correcting significant inaccuracies
-
Restructuring a substantial portion of the article
Minor cosmetic edits do not necessarily justify changing the updated date.
Medical Review After a Correction
Some corrections may require additional medical review.
This is particularly relevant when the issue involves:
-
Medication safety
-
Treatment recommendations
-
Diagnostic information
-
Serious symptoms
-
Pregnancy
-
Mental health
-
Emergency conditions
-
Medical procedures
-
Drug interactions
When a qualified healthcare professional performs a genuine review, the article may display the reviewer’s name, credentials, and review date in accordance with our Medical Review Policy.
Corrections to Previously Medically Reviewed Content
Medical review does not guarantee that information will never need to change.
Evidence and clinical guidance can evolve.
If medically reviewed content later becomes outdated or inaccurate, we may:
-
Update the affected information
-
Consult newer evidence
-
Request another professional review
-
Change the medical review date after a genuine re-review
-
Add clarification where guidance remains uncertain
Reader-Reported Corrections
Readers are encouraged to tell us when they believe an article contains inaccurate, outdated, or misleading information.
When submitting a correction request, please include:
-
The URL of the article
-
The statement or section in question
-
A brief explanation of the concern
-
The corrected information you believe should appear
-
A reliable source supporting the correction, if available
Supporting sources are particularly helpful for medical or scientific correction requests.
Sources We Consider
Depending on the topic, we may consider information from:
-
Government health agencies
-
Public health authorities
-
Regulatory agencies
-
Medical professional associations
-
Clinical guidelines
-
Universities and academic medical centers
-
Peer-reviewed scientific literature
-
Official medication information
-
Other authoritative primary sources
The presence of information on another website alone does not automatically establish that a correction is required.
We assess the quality, relevance, and currency of the evidence.
Differences in Medical Opinion
Not every disagreement represents an error.
Medical recommendations sometimes vary because of:
-
Differences between professional guidelines
-
Differences between countries
-
Emerging evidence
-
Patient-specific circumstances
-
Different interpretations of available research
When credible authorities disagree, we aim to represent that uncertainty fairly rather than presenting one position as universally accepted.
Corrections Involving Product or Company Information
Companies, manufacturers, healthcare providers, or other organizations may contact us regarding factual statements about their products or services.
We review these requests using the same editorial principles applied to other corrections.
Commercial pressure alone does not determine whether information is changed.
Where appropriate, we may verify information using:
-
Official documentation
-
Regulatory records
-
Published evidence
-
Current product information
-
Independent authoritative sources
Removing Content
In some situations, correcting an article may not be sufficient.
We may remove, redirect, or substantially rewrite content if:
-
The central premise is inaccurate
-
The article relies heavily on unsupported claims
-
Reliable evidence contradicts the article’s main conclusion
-
The content presents an unreasonable safety risk
-
The article has become obsolete
-
The content substantially duplicates a stronger resource on the site
Removal decisions are made case by case.
Archived and Legacy Content
The Health Carey contains articles published at different stages of the website’s development.
Older content may not always reflect our current editorial standards.
As part of our ongoing editorial work, legacy articles may be:
-
Fact-checked
-
Updated
-
Re-sourced
-
Medically reviewed
-
Consolidated
-
Redirected
-
Removed
Readers who find concerns in older articles are encouraged to report them.
Transparency
Our objective is not to create the impression that published content can never contain an error.
Instead, we aim to maintain a process for identifying, evaluating, and correcting problems when they occur.
Responsible health publishing requires continued review as evidence and medical guidance evolve.
How to Report a Correction
To report a possible error, contact:
Please include the article URL, the information you believe is incorrect, and any reliable supporting source that may help us review the issue.
You can also contact us through our Contact Us page.
Important Note
Submitting a correction request does not guarantee that a requested change will be made.
We review requests based on available evidence, source quality, editorial relevance, and the accuracy of the existing content.
Medical disagreements or personal experiences are considered carefully but do not automatically override established scientific or clinical evidence.













